A Guide to Imputed Income in Divorce

One of the critical aspects that often arises in divorce cases is the determination of each spouse’s income for the purpose of calculating support obligations. In situations where one spouse is unemployed or underemployed, New Jersey courts may impute income to that individual based on their earning capacity. This process, known as imputed income, plays a significant role in ensuring fairness and equity in divorce settlements. In this blog post, we will delve into the concept of imputed income as it relates to divorce in New Jersey, exploring its definition, purpose, factors considered, and its impact on divorce proceedings. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of imputed income, individuals navigating divorce can better prepare themselves for the legal process and ensure their rights are protected.A Guide to Imputed Income in Divorce

What is Imputed Income?

Imputed income refers to the income attributed to a spouse by the court, even if they are not currently earning that amount or are not fully utilizing their earning capacity. In essence, imputed income reflects what the court believes the individual is capable of earning based on factors such as education, training, work history, and job opportunities in the current market.

Purpose of Imputed Income in New Jersey Divorce Cases

The primary purpose of imputed income in New Jersey divorce cases is to prevent spouses from avoiding their financial responsibilities by intentionally underreporting or minimizing their income. Imputing income ensures that both parties contribute fairly to the financial support of themselves and any dependents, including children. It also promotes economic fairness and prevents financial exploitation in divorce settlements.

Quote

I was very fortunate to find Tanya online during an urgent family matter. I was able to speak with her on our situation and she immediately jumped on the case the same day. I was impressed at her knowledge and her team as they were able to answer questions on the spot and navigate through an unpleasant situation. Her honesty and responsiveness have made this process much easier, and the support she has provided has truly gone above my expectation of a family law firm. This is truly an exceptional firm & I would highly recommend.”

- Lydia Martinez

Quote

My father recently hired Tanya Freeman; Family Law Attorney and her team as a replacement to handle his divorce which has been going nowhere for over 3 years with a different attorney. Tanya and her team have done so much within just a few months for his trial and has given my father a new sense of hope. The team is always quick to respond to any questions. The case is still ongoing, however, my father has newly restored confidence that he will be treated fairly and with his best interest in mind. We definitely recommend Tanya Freeman; Family Law Attorney."

- Molly Howard

Quote

Tanya is an outstanding attorney! Her attentiveness to detail and willingness to be honest with her clients means you’re going to get the best possible outcome for your case. She and her team went above and beyond, making sure my divorce and custody case ended neatly and in the best interest of my children. Her pricing is reasonable and she’s willing to work with you. I highly recommend Tanya Freeman to anyone going through a divorce or family law case!"

- Jenifer Mckinney

Factors Considered in Imputing Income

Imputing income in New Jersey divorces is not automatic and requires specific conditions to be met. Some of the key factors that courts consider when deciding whether to award imputed income include:

Willful Unemployment or Underemployment: One of the primary conditions for imputing income in a New Jersey divorce is the determination that a spouse is willfully unemployed or underemployed. Willful unemployment refers to a situation where a spouse voluntarily chooses not to seek or accept employment, despite having the ability to do so. Similarly, willful underemployment occurs when a spouse intentionally works in a position that pays less than their potential earning capacity.

Demonstrated Ability to Earn: In order for income to be imputed, the court must find that the unemployed or underemployed spouse has the ability to earn income based on factors such as education, training, work experience, and job opportunities in the current market. The court may consider the spouse’s past employment history, qualifications, and occupational skills to assess their earning potential.

Availability of Suitable Employment Opportunities: Another condition for imputed income is the existence of suitable employment opportunities for the unemployed or underemployed spouse. The court will consider the local job market conditions, including unemployment rates, industry trends, and demand for specific skills, to determine whether the spouse could reasonably secure employment that matches their qualifications and earning capacity.

Voluntary Choices Leading to Unemployment or Underemployment: Courts in New Jersey may impute income if they find that the spouse’s unemployment or underemployment is the result of voluntary choices or actions. This could include decisions such as quitting a job without just cause, refusing to apply for available positions, or working part-time when full-time employment is feasible.

Obligation to Support Dependents: The court may also impute income if the unemployed or underemployed spouse has a legal obligation to support dependents, such as children from a previous relationship. Imputing income ensures that both parties contribute proportionally to the financial support of their dependents, even if one spouse is not actively earning income.

Tanya Freeman

Tanya L. Freeman, Attorney at Law

Managing Partner of the Family Law Practice at Callagy Law

More than an accomplished divorce and family law attorney, Tanya L. Freeman, is a consummate professional with a wealth of corporate and life experience.

Known as a leader and strategist, Tanya L. Freeman was appointed by the Governor of New Jersey as Chair of the Board of Directors of the University Hospital in Newark, New Jersey.

Tanya L. Freeman also presents among the ranks of public speakers. She captivates and inspires professional groups nationwide. "Tanya has the eloquence and oratory brilliance with the ability to forge deep connections with her listeners."

What is the Impact of Imputed Income on Divorce Proceedings?

Imputed income can have significant implications for various aspects of divorce proceedings, including:

Child Support: Imputed income may be used to calculate child support obligations, ensuring that both parents contribute proportionally to the financial needs of their children.

Alimony: Imputed income may also influence the determination of alimony payments, particularly if one spouse is intentionally unemployed or underemployed.

Property Division: Imputed income may affect the division of marital assets and liabilities, as it can impact each spouse’s financial resources and earning capacity.

In New Jersey divorce cases, imputed income serves as a crucial tool for ensuring fairness and equity in financial matters. By imputing income based on a spouse’s earning capacity, courts strive to prevent manipulation of financial disclosures and promote economic fairness in divorce settlements. As experienced family law attorneys, we understand the complexities of imputed income and its implications for our clients. If you are involved in a divorce where imputed income is a relevant issue, we are here to provide experienced guidance and advocacy to protect your rights and achieve a just outcome.

10 Best Tanya Freeman
10 Best Tanya Freeman

Defenses Against Imputing Income

When confronted with the challenge of having your income unfairly imputed, there are several proactive steps you can take to safeguard your financial interests. First and foremost, it’s imperative to produce substantial evidence that any unemployment or underemployment you are experiencing is involuntary. This involves presenting concrete documentation, such as notices of job termination, medical records showcasing disability or illness, or other proof that convincingly demonstrates external factors are the reason for not achieving full earning potential.

Another critical aspect is to prove your active engagement in seeking employment. This is particularly important if there’s a perception or accusation that you are deliberately avoiding employment to minimize financial responsibilities. To counter this, detailed records of job searches, including applications submitted, interviews attended, networking events participated in, and any form of job training or further education undertaken to enhance employability, should be compiled and presented.

In situations where your earning capacity is under scrutiny, leveraging expert analysis through vocational evaluations or testimony can be particularly effective. Vocational experts, with their understanding of the job market and specific skill assessments, can provide an objective analysis of your potential to earn, thereby offering a robust defense against claims of underemployment or unemployment.

Addressing barriers to employment is also crucial. If there are legitimate factors like age, health issues, lack of local job opportunities, or responsibilities such as childcare or dependent care that hinder your ability to work or earn at full capacity, these should be clearly communicated and substantiated in court. This can help in establishing a realistic view of your employment challenges.

Requesting a temporary relief hearing can be a strategic move to manage your immediate financial situation amid divorce proceedings. Such hearings allow for a temporary reassessment of financial support, focusing on actual income rather than imputed income, which can provide temporary relief until a final decision is made.

Lastly, exploring the possibility of negotiating a settlement agreement should not be overlooked. This avenue can offer a more adaptable and personally tailored solution to income imputation issues. By engaging in negotiations with the other party and their legal representation, it might be possible to arrive at a consensus that fairly addresses the financial needs and limitations of both parties, potentially avoiding the rigidity and unpredictability of court-imposed decisions.

Related Videos

Advocating For You

Whether you are receiving imputed income or at risk of having your income imputed, Tanya L. Freeman’s decades of experience, passion for family law, and professionalism are ready to be put to work for you. Contact her office today, and get started on ensuring a fair divorce — and a better start to a new chapter in your life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *